Voice Over Ip India News
EMPTY feed http://www.itpapers.com/xml/RSS-6.xmlEMPTY feed http://voip.weblogsinc.com/entries.rdfEMPTY feed http://myst-technology.com/mysmartchannels/public/item/51752?model=rss4mssEMPTY feed http://voiponcall.blogharbor.com/blog/index.xmlEMPTY feed http://myst-technology.com/mysmartchannels/public/item/51727?model=rss4mssEMPTY feed http://www.thearmchairgeek.com/index.rdfEMPTY feed http://www.thearmchairgeek.com/index.rdfEMPTY feed http://technology.updates.com/rss/voip_rss.xmlEMPTY feed http://spaces.msn.com/members/omnispace1952/feed.rss
Real time social media support
A recent catv voip deployment
"post" by voip pundit Jeff Pulver on "real time" social media got me thinking about what what be an extremely useful Facebook app- a Skype app that would set up either ad hoc or scheduled conference calls.
Skype already has a multiperson audio/video calling capability and packet8 promo code
hacking vonage
of add ons to do things like whiteboarding, application sharing and many others. I know there is already a "Skype" application for Facebook but it is bordering on useless (which is close to the utility of most Facebook apps that I have seen but that is another discussion)
Skype outage cause clarified
It is heartening to see the Skype response to ip mobility voip bts rel services
deafening roar from the anti Microsoft crowd saying Microsoft somehow caused the Skype outage:
It's not what you say. It's what they hear...We don't voip agent reseller
anyone but ourselves. The Microsoft Update patches were merely a catalyst - a trigger - for a series of events that led to the disruption of Skype, not the root cause of it. And Microsoft has been very helpful and supportive throughout. us philippine voip
Skype problems
Hmm -- it seems like Skype has gone tits up. proyecto VOIP client is in Vonage Complaints
continual "Skype (connecting)" state and has turnkey voip opportunity
for an hour or so. From the Skype status page:
UPDATED 14:02 GMT: Some of you may be having ip transport network service provided voip
logging into Skype. Our engineering team has determined that it’s a software issue. We expect this to be resolved within 12 to voip telephone service sarasota fl hours. Meanwhile, you can simply leave your Skype client running and as soon as the issue is resolved, you will be logged in. We apologize for the inconvenience.
12 to 24 hours!
Skype
Last year I commented (well maybe I whined?) about the lack of progress in the real time conferencing on the Internet front.
I hadn't really been paying much attention but lately I have been looking into the add-ins available for internet phone & Canada
It seems that Skype's ubiquity (and availability of a usable API) has spawned a host of tools for the Voice over Internet Protocol Examples
ad hoc meeter including a couple of whiteboards, application sharing tools, and file sharing tools. With Skypes multi way audio/video conferencing functionality it looks like it might be starting to fulfil the promise of NetMeeting.
I haven't had a chance to use any of these add-ins though. Has anybody tried them? Which ones? Do they support Skype's multiparty functions? SIPLACE solutions
Visitalk.com ghost
In 1999 (I think that that is the timing) I was invited to go to Phoenix (on their dime) to visit a company (visitalk.com) with grand plans to build a "internet phone directory" mostly aimed at NetMeeting users. At the time I had internet phone iraq
standing in the NetMeeting world being one of two Microsoft NetMeeting MVPs (the other was Robert Scoble of Scobleizer fame). I wasn't totally sure why I was invited (maybe it was a job interview?) but I found out they had grand expansion plans, somewhat vague business plans, and apparently $50 million dollars that they were burning through at a furious rate.
When I returned I added a mini review to my NetMeeting information site. Shortly after that apparently the money ran out, visitalk.com declared bankruptcy and that voip phone review lingo packet8 at&t
the end of it.
But the site www.visitalk.com stayed. To vonagereviews
day at least 7 years after bankruptcy it continues to operate -- apparently able to take payments for VoIP solutions tx internet service that I doubt still operates.
A true ghost from the TAO VOIP DUALPHONE
Digital Meeting on the Internet
I have been involved with NetMeeting for so long that I have turned grey in the process. And NetMeeting has gotten old and grey in the process as well. Microsoft's decision to retire NetMeeting (after basically abandoning development in 1999) is no doubt the right decision. What surprises me is that there is no other product out there with the promise that NetMeeting once had (at least for me). What I expected from NetMeeting when it first came out was that it would evolve into a product that supported:
ad hoc multiparty audio/video meetings (or at least multiparty audio) over the Internet without the need for a separate server (except perhaps for location and presence information)
multiparty data sharing could happen during the meeting (application sharing, whiteboard sharing, file sharing seemed like a good basic set)
No product today supports this functionality set and it seems none have plans to do so. Msn Messenger supports one to one audio/video, and one to one data sharing. Skype supports serverless multiparty audio/video (currently just in beta I think). GoogleTalk supports very little despite a recent release and some misplaced hype.
What is the problem here? Does nobody else recognize the need? Or are there still some barriers that I am not aware of?
I recognize that along the way there were various technological and infrastructure barriers in the way:
individual bandwidth restrictions were a problem -there is a lot of personal bandwidth connectivity in at least most of the western world -- not much dialup anymore
computing power to process and mix audio/video in the past has been a problem -- today many machines have more than ample computer power
internet gateways were a block on some types of interaction -- but UPnP functionality in modern gateway devices has largely eliminated that problem
Is there some barrier still left that I am not seeing? Why hasn't this technology developed beyond 1999?
H.323 is dead
Of this there can be no doubt. It really isn't "news" though. It essentially has been in a state of limbo since 1999 -- when the last update for NetMeeting was released by Microsoft (and the revelation that vonage phone instructions
will be no NetMeeting in Vista is no suprise). Shortly thereafter Microsoft chose to voice over internet scam
up the NetMeeting development team and go in another direction. The machinations following that decision asia broadband phone
least for Microsoft software users) have been somewhat painful.
Pity though -- neither NetMeeting nor anything that followed have delivered on the initial promise (and what interested me in NetMeeting in the first place) - the ability to do real-time multiparty audio conversations with "shared space" data sharing over the internet.
Skype 2.0 10 way conferencing
vonagereviews tenor voip multipath products about Skype 2.0 supporting 10 way audio conferencing! Wow!
NetMeeting status
how to test SIP user agent
posting Explanation of Voice over Internet Protocol
Microsoft on the status Voice over IP Free Download
NetMeeting.
Festoon looks interesting
This appeared this morning.
Festoon looks like a product that has a chance to catch on. It seems simple, straightforward to use, apparently supports multiparty audio/video (and one to many with up to 200 viewers), and has an application and ip transport network service provided voip imcc
sharing feature. It will piggyback on the Skype or GoogleTalk calling and presence functions. I really haven't seen it in action and don't know whether it is Vonage And Internet
(especially from a bandwidth usage point of view) but seems to offer everything that I long ago wished NetMeeting had.
It seems to have a shortcoming that was also obvious in NetMeeting though (though there at least a pull through of other Microsoft product vonage stocks
was potentially possible)-- there seems to be no obvious way to make money.
|
