Voip Service Provided Imcc News
EMPTY feed http://voiponcall.blogharbor.com/blog/index.xmlEMPTY feed http://myst-technology.com/mysmartchannels/public/item/51749?model=rss4mssEMPTY feed http://voip-blog.tmcnet.com/blog/greg-galitzine/index.rdf
Real time social media support
A recent Facebook VoIP Voice over IP Netzwerke www-audit
by voip pundit Jeff Pulver Voip internet telephony canada
"real time" social media got me thinking about what what be an extremely useful Facebook app- a Skype app that would set up either ad hoc or scheduled conference calls.
Skype already voip as a home based business a multiperson audio/video calling capability and a host of add ons to do things like whiteboarding, application sharing and many others. I what does the SIP Program has to do with Security
there is already a "Skype" application for Facebook but it is bordering on useless (which is close to the utility of most Facebook apps that I Switch Router IT Shop VoIP seen but that is another discussion)
Skype outage cause clarified
It is heartening to see the Skype response to the deafening roar from the anti Microsoft crowd saying Microsoft somehow caused the Skype outage:
It's not what you windows messenger sip
It's what they hear...We don't blame anyone but ourselves. The Microsoft how a siphon works
patches were merely a catalyst - a trigger - for a series of events that led to the disruption of Skype, not the root cause of it. And Microsoft has been very helpful and supportive throughout. voip consultant
Skype problems
Hmm -- it seems like Skype has gone tits up. The client is in a continual "Skype (connecting)" state and has been windows messenger sip
an hour or so. From the Skype status page:
UPDATED certified member of SIP
GMT: Some of you may be having problems logging into Skype. Our engineering team has determined that it’s a software issue. We expect this to be resolved within 12 to 24 hours. Meanwhile, you can simply leave your Skype client running and as soon as the issue is resolved, you will be logged in. We apologize for the inconvenience.
12 to 24 hours! kurt sipolski
Skype
Last year I commented (well maybe I sip home kits
about the lack of progress in the real time conferencing on the Internet front.
I hadn't really been paying much attention but lately I have been looking into the add-ins available for Skype. It seems that Skype's ubiquity (and availability of a usable API) has spawned a host of tools for the small ad hoc meeter including a couple of whiteboards, application sharing tools, and file sharing tools. With Skypes multi way audio/video conferencing functionality it looks like it might be starting to fulfil the promise of NetMeeting.
I haven't had a chance to use any VoIPhandheld deviceswireless
these add-ins though. Has anybody tried them? Which ones? Do they support Skype's multiparty functions?
Visitalk.com ghost
In 1999 (I think that that is the timing) I was invited to go to Phoenix (on their dime) to visit a company (visitalk.com) with grand plans to build a "internet phone directory" mostly aimed at NetMeeting users. At the time I had some standing in the NetMeeting world being one of two Microsoft NetMeeting MVPs (the other was Robert Scoble of Scobleizer fame). I wasn't totally sure why I was invited (maybe it was a job interview?) but I found out they had grand expansion plans, somewhat vague business plans, and apparently $50 million dollars that they were burning through at a furious rate.
When I returned I added a mini review to my NetMeeting information site. Shortly after that apparently the money ran out, visitalk.com declared bankruptcy grandstream 286 voip adapter
that seemed the end of it.
But the site www.visitalk.com stayed. To this day at least 7 years after bankruptcy it continues to operate -- apparently able to take payments for the internet service that I vonage+direcway+setup
still operates.
A true ghost from the past. voip mid cities
Digital Meeting on the Internet
I have been involved with NetMeeting for so long that I have turned grey in the process. And NetMeeting has gotten old and grey in the process as well. Microsoft's decision to retire NetMeeting (after basically abandoning development in 1999) is no doubt the right decision. cheap pc to phone iraq
surprises me is that there is no other product out there with the promise that NetMeeting once had (at least for me). What I expected from NetMeeting when it first came out was that it would evolve into a product that supported:
ad hoc multiparty audio/video meetings (or at least multiparty audio) over the Internet without the need for a separate server (except perhaps for location and presence information)
multiparty data sharing could happen during the meeting (application sharing, whiteboard sharing, file sharing seemed like a good basic set)
No product today supports this functionality set and it seems none have plans to do so. Msn Messenger supports one to one audio/video, and one to one data sharing. Skype supports serverless multiparty audio/video (currently just in beta I think). GoogleTalk supports very little despite a recent release and some misplaced hype.
What is the problem here? Does nobody else recognize the need? Or are there still some barriers that I am not aware of?
I recognize that along the way there were various technological and infrastructure barriers in the way:
individual bandwidth restrictions were a problem -there is a lot of personal bandwidth connectivity in at least most of the western world -- not much dialup anymore
computing power to process and mix audio/video in the past has been a problem -- today many machines have more than ample computer power
internet gateways were a block on some types of interaction -- but UPnP functionality in modern gateway devices has largely eliminated that problem
Is there Sipix SC-1300 digital camera manual
barrier still left that I am not seeing? Why hasn't this technology developed beyond 1999?
iti voip alarm issues
H.323 is dead
Of this there can be no doubt. It really isn't "news" though. It essentially hacking vonage
been in a history of voice over internet protocol
of limbo since 1999 -- when the last update for NetMeeting was released by Microsoft (and the revelation that there will be no NetMeeting in Vista is no suprise). Shortly thereafter Microsoft chose to break up the NetMeeting development team and go in another direction. The machinations following that decision (at least for Microsoft software users) have been somewhat painful.
Pity though -- neither NetMeeting nor anything that followed have delivered on the initial promise (and what interested me in NetMeeting in the first place) - the ability to do real-time multiparty audio conversations with "shared space" data sharing over the internet.
Skype 2.0 10 way conferencing
Saw this about Skype 2.0 supporting 10 way audio conferencing! Wow!
NetMeeting status
A posting at&t call advantage x-pro sip configuration
on the status history of voice over internet protocol NetMeeting.
Festoon looks interesting
This appeared this morning.
Festoon looks Summary of VOIP for Business
a product that has a chance to catch on. It seems simple, straightforward to use, apparently supports multiparty audio/video (and one to many with up to 200 viewers), and has an application and desktop sharing feature. It will piggyback on the Skype or Free PC To Phone For USA calling and presence functions. I really haven't seen it in action and don't know whether it is practical (especially from a bandwidth usage point of view) but seems to offer everything that I long ago wished NetMeeting had.
It seems to have a shortcoming that was also obvious in NetMeeting though (though there at least Explanation of Voice over Internet Protocol pull voice over internet protocol peer reviewed
of other Microsoft product purchase was potentially possible)-- there seems to be no obvious way to make money.
|
